Editor's Note
2016's Last Best Shot
HME will push the 114th one last time for rural bid relief. Can we make a lame duck fly?
- By David Kopf
- Nov 01, 2016
You’re probably reading this
column a few days before election day, and while
political persuasions might vary across the industry’s
membership, there is one unifying public
policy opinion among the HME community:
competitive bidding needs to change.
The question is, can we reform the program in
time? Since national competitive bidding rates were
fully applied to all providers nationwide on July 1,
we have seen the nasty results of that policy: not
only are rural providers hurting, but so too are
all providers. Patients are clearly having difficulty
getting their supplies and now many rural
providers are telling major media outlets that they
have hung up their hats when it comes to taking on
new Medicare beneficiaries.
Furthermore, we have seen how the expansion
has had a ripple effect. The case in point has been
TRICARE, the medical insurance program that
covers members of the military and their families.
TRICARE started radically cutting its reimbursement
in response to Medicare’s July 1 cuts and now
many providers are unable to help this underserved
healthcare demographic.
Enter the Lame Duck
The industry tried to reform the expansion countless
times during the summer and came agonizingly
close on two occasions, but disagreements
between the House and Senate in terms of a pay-for
sent the industry back to the drawing board. Then,
in September, the industry tried to use the post-Summer recess session to squeeze in reforms before
lawmakers recessed to hit the campaign trail in
earnest. That effort didn’t pan out, either.
This leaves us the lame-duck session of the
114th Congress, which will run from when the
elections have ended to when the 115th Congress
takes over on Jan. 3, 2017. This will be the industry’s
last best shot at securing a reform of national
expansion in order to provide relief to rural
providers and patients before the great, big chessboard
of American politics is reset and the game of
creating public policy begins anew.
And, like a limpy duck, these lawmakers will
only have so much ability to drive public policy
before their possible replacements set up shop.
That said, this is the hand the industry has been
dealt and the industry has proven that it can still
pull out a decent hand or two when the legislative
chips are down.
Bearing that in mind, as this issue goes to press,
two useful pieces of information were just released
that could help the industry build its case:
First, the American Association for Homecare
released a study that showed the reimbursement
rates for items offered under the competitive
bidding program were substantially less than the
costs for providers to offer those products and
services. This, of course, raises serious doubts
about the sustainability of the program.
The study, which was performed by Dobson
DaVanzo & Associates, surveyed costs and
reimbursement for a wide variety of competitive
bid items, and found that, on average, the reimbursement
for the products surveyed only covered
88 percent of the overall cost of providing those
products after all operational and purchase costs
were factored in.
Second, the Government Accountability Office
just published “CMS’s Round 2 Durable Medical
Equipment and National Mail-order Diabetes
Testing Supplies Competitive Bidding Programs”
at press time, and it showed declined access to
DMEPOS items in bid areas.
According to the GAO study, the number
of beneficiaries receiving DME in Round Two
competitive bidding areas generally decreased
after implementation of Round Two, as well as the
National Mail-Order Program. The GAO also found
that some CBAs were only served by a single active
supplier, or were dominated by a single supplier
with a large market share.
These are important findings that might help
the industry secure a win despite the lameduck
session. The key will be for all providers to
continue their active involvement in the industry’s
advocacy efforts. If this is our last shot of 2016, let’s
make it count.
This article originally appeared in the November 2016 issue of HME Business.
About the Author
David Kopf is the Publisher HME Business, DME Pharmacy and Mobility Management magazines. He was Executive Editor of HME Business and DME Pharmacy from 2008 to 2023. Follow him on LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/dkopf/ and on Twitter at @postacutenews.